Submit a Response
Response to:
A flood-resistant nest box for wetland-dependent secondary cavity-nesting birds
Peer, B. D., and P. Page. 2026. A flood-resistant nest box for wetland-dependent secondary cavity-nesting birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 97(2):5.
The following peer-reviewed responses to this article have been published:
A flood-resistant nest box for wetland-dependent secondary cavity-nesting birds
Peer, B. D., and P. Page. 2026. A flood-resistant nest box for wetland-dependent secondary cavity-nesting birds. Journal of Field Ornithology 97(2):5.
Refining methods to add stable isotope analysis of migratory bird fat to the ornithological toolbox
Lindsay, A. M., M. M. Jacobs, H. M. Streby, and A. E. Wiley. 2026. Refining methods to add stable isotope analysis of migratory bird fat to the ornithological toolbox. Journal of Field Ornithology 97(2):4.
Demographic patterns and habitat associations of non-breeding Northern Shrikes (Lanius borealis) in Minnesota
Valine, A., D. Alexander, A. Bracey, S. R. Kolbe, and A. Grinde. 2026. Demographic patterns and habitat associations of non-breeding Northern Shrikes (Lanius borealis) in Minnesota. Journal of Field Ornithology 97(2):3.
Geographic variation of the song of the Belding’s Yellowthroat Geothlypis beldingi in the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico
Córdova, I., P. Escalante-Pliego, P. Laiolo, F. González-Garcia, O. Rojas-Soto, and G. Arnaud. 2026. Geographic variation of the song of the Belding’s Yellowthroat Geothlypis beldingi in the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Journal of Field Ornithology 97(2):2.
Implementation of passive acoustic monitoring to assess site-specific avian diversity on private lands
Fradet, D. T., B. J. Furnas, and A. Engilis Jr. 2026. Implementation of passive acoustic monitoring to assess site-specific avian diversity on private lands. Journal of Field Ornithology 97(2):1.
If you wish to submit a response and you are already registered with the journal, follow this link. If you have never registered with the journal, please follow this link.
We welcome comments from readers that summarize data or experiences, or that review other papers or books that amplify the original article. Comments will be accepted only if factual, thoughtful, and substantive. If opinions are included, they must move the discussion forward. The Editor-in-Chief who oversaw the peer-review of this article will act as the moderator of all responses. If a response is accepted for publication, it will be linked to the original article under the heading “Responses to this Article”.
A response may be of any length, and may include additional materials such as figures or tables. Short responses (under 250 words) will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief of the original article. Longer responses and those that include additional material will be subject to more rigorous screening. All responses that are accepted for publication will appear as separate articles, but will be cross-linked to the original article.